Subject(s)
Criminal Law/legislation & jurisprudence , Domestic Violence/prevention & control , Law Enforcement/methods , Sex Offenses/prevention & control , Social Work/methods , Violence/prevention & control , Adolescent , Alcoholism/epidemiology , Awareness , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , Depression/epidemiology , Domestic Violence/psychology , Domestic Violence/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Sex Offenses/psychology , Sex Offenses/statistics & numerical data , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/epidemiology , Suicide/statistics & numerical data , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Violence/psychology , Violence/statistics & numerical data , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiologyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The disproportionate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Latino communities has resulted in greater reports of depression, anxiety, and stress. We present a community-led intervention in Latino communities that integrated social services in mental health service delivery for an equity-based response. METHODS: We used tracking sheets to identify 1,436 unique participants (aged 5-86) enrolled in Latino Health Access's Emotional Wellness program, of whom 346 enrolled in the pre-COVID-19 period (March 2019-February 2020) and 1,090 in the COVID-19 period (March-June 2020). Demographic characteristics and types of services were aggregated to assess monthly trends using Pearson χ2 tests. Regression models were developed to compare factors associated with referrals in the pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 periods. RESULTS: During the pandemic, service volume (P < .001) and participant volume (P < .001) increased significantly compared with the prepandemic period. Participant characteristics were similar during both periods, the only differences being age distribution, expanded geographic range, and increased male participation during the pandemic. Nonreferred services, such as peer support, increased during the pandemic period. Type of referrals significantly changed from primarily mental health services and disease management in the prepandemic period to affordable housing support, food assistance, and supplemental income. CONCLUSION: An effective mental health program in response to the pandemic must incorporate direct mental health services and address social needs that exacerbate mental health risk for Latino communities. This study presents a model of how to integrate both factors by leveraging promotor-led programs.
Subject(s)
Anxiety , COVID-19 , Community Mental Health Services/organization & administration , Depression , Hispanic or Latino , Stress, Psychological , Adult , Anxiety/etiology , Anxiety/prevention & control , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/psychology , Depression/etiology , Depression/prevention & control , Emotional Adjustment , Female , Hispanic or Latino/psychology , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Mental Health/ethnology , Psychosocial Support Systems , SARS-CoV-2 , Social Work/methods , Stress, Psychological/etiology , Stress, Psychological/prevention & control , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
This commentary addresses barriers to care among older adults living with neurodiversity (ND), and their aging family carers in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada. Factors contributing to inequities are described and the significant negative consequences of current policy decisions on the social and mental health of older adults with ND and their aging family carers are highlighted. The commentary calls for a collective social work response that highlights the critical role of support and advocacy necessary to redress social exclusion.
Subject(s)
Aging/psychology , Caregivers/psychology , Disabled Persons/rehabilitation , Caregivers/standards , Disabled Persons/psychology , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , Social Work/methodsSubject(s)
Aging , Coronavirus Infections , Geriatric Psychiatry , Health Services for the Aged , Mental Health Services , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Social Work , Aged , Aging/physiology , Aging/psychology , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Communicable Disease Control/methods , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/psychology , Geriatric Psychiatry/methods , Geriatric Psychiatry/trends , Health Services Needs and Demand , Health Services for the Aged/organization & administration , Health Services for the Aged/supply & distribution , Humans , Independent Living , Ireland/epidemiology , Mental Health/trends , Mental Health Services/organization & administration , Mental Health Services/trends , Needs Assessment , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/psychology , Psychosocial Support Systems , Residential Facilities , SARS-CoV-2 , Social Isolation/psychology , Social Work/methods , Social Work/trendsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To determine any change in referral patterns and outcomes in children (0-18) referred for child protection medical examination (CPME) during the COVID-19 pandemic compared with previous years. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study, analysing routinely collected clinical data from CPME reports in a rapid response to the pandemic lockdown. SETTING: Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Trust, which provides all routine CPME for Birmingham, England, population 1.1 million including 288 000 children. PARTICIPANTS: Children aged under 18 years attending CPME during an 18-week period from late February to late June during the years 2018-2020. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Numbers of referrals, source of disclosure and outcomes from CPME. RESULTS: There were 78 CPME referrals in 2018, 75 in 2019 and 47 in 2020, this was a 39.7% (95% CI 12.4% to 59.0%) reduction in referrals from 2018 to 2020, and a 37.3% (95% CI 8.6% to 57.4%) reduction from 2019 to 2020. There were fewer CPME referrals initiated by school staff in 2020, 12 (26%) compared with 36 (47%) and 38 (52%) in 2018 and 2019, respectively. In all years 75.9% of children were known to social care prior to CPME, and 94% of CPME concluded that there were significant safeguarding concerns. CONCLUSIONS: School closure due to COVID-19 may have harmed children as child abuse has remained hidden. There needs to be either mandatory attendance at schools in future or viable alternatives found. There may be a significant increase in safeguarding referrals when schools fully reopen as children disclose the abuse they have experienced at home.